sawheeler52 wrote:
hueey,
Though I have no and never have felt h**e for any person, he's my 2-cents from a progressive leftie.
9-0 v**e, 100% agree.
I offer for consideration by all, this Supreme Court decision just demonstrated definitional judicial "activism," which I can only hope we all think is a bad idea.
What do I see as activism?
The SINGULAR question at contest was can a state disqualify a candidate from a Federal e******n b****t. Nothing more.
The Court got this one right, 9-0.
The Court's decision continued on, after deciding on the singular issue, to add that the ONLY way to disqualify a federal candidate was through legislation passed by both Houses and signed by the president, eliminating Federal Courts from any decision-making process.
Can anyone here agree that this was indeed judicial activism?
If you get a chance, read Amy Coney Barrett's (certainly no leftie) decision comment.
H**e is not part of my world.
Tight lines,
Stephen
hueey, br Though I have no and never have felt h**... (
show quote)