Barnacles wrote:
When I was young, a good tan was considered by most of us to be "healthy". Like so many others, I used to lay there in the sun every spring, probably sizzling like a slice of bacon. I have red hair and fair skin, so I burn easily. The thinking was that a good tan would give me some protection from burning during the summer. It didn't really work. To make matters worse, just about all of my recreation has been outside, usually on or near water where the reflection increases your UV exposure.
Now in my 70's, I see the dermatologist every 6 months for a skin survey. All my freckles, moles and scars offer a camouflage for skin problems, so I need a professional to check me over. Three times so far, I've had Basal cell carcinomas taken off. That's the least worrisome of the three main kinds of skin cancer. At every visit, I have keratoses that have to be frozen. By evening, I always look like someone has beaten the crap out of me.
One thing to consider is that if you ever have a melanoma, that's the T-REX of skin cancers. When they remove that, they cut deep and wide. Because it's so dangerous they want generous 'clear margins' around the problem. That means that you're gonna have a biga$$ scar, or skin grafts. And that's the best-case scenario.
When I was young, a good tan was considered by mos... (
show quote)
It doesn't have to be that way. I had a melanoma on my right upper arm. The VA gave me a tube of salve made in Israel, told to apply twice a day for two weeks and only stop treatment if the area started to bleed bad. By the end of one week the small area where they took the sample to biopsy was larger than a quarter. Sore but bareable. At the end of the second week the area was almost the size of a half dollar. I called the VA. The dermatologist called back and said stop use Wich I did. The hole in my arm healed healed completely and the only sign is a small white scar where they did the biopsy.