Still above water wrote:
๐๐ Some people donโt get it. Maybe it was an Italian salmon!๐๐๐
Maybe. I use to work in Italian restaurant and it was considered the best food at that time by a study. I got nothing against anyone from anywhere.
Looks like a hella catch to me. ๐
people that dont know what they are talking about ought to shut up. beautiful fish, good eating, and not runing any fishery. go back to your puny bass and trouser trout.
That is a beautiful female salmon Iโm sure she was a blast to catch and will be delicious on the plate. As long as the hatcheries are doing their job there is no problem with keeping that fish. When I lived in Alaska we had multiple types of hatchery, state run facilities, and private co-ops of Combinations of Gillnetters, seiners, trollers,Etc. In Ketchikan Alaska I fished The mouth of their return stream. Depending on how good the run was we were allowed from 1 to 12 (banner years) Per day. We would Fish through the dark ones and keep the silver ones to vacuum seal for Winters dinner.
smithma wrote:
people that dont know what they are talking about ought to shut up. beautiful fish, good eating, and not runing any fishery. go back to your puny bass and trouser trout.
LMFAO.......just exactly what I was thinking as I read comments from a Bay boy and a Floridian.
I will take one picture of a fine salmonid over the myriad of daily posts stating "I'm going tomorrow" followed by a post a day or two later from the same guy(s) with several pics of virtually the exact same "smallie"(apropos name, regarding size in pics) over and over, week in, week out. Fish that wouldn't even excite a child or newbie.....much less provide any epicurean delight.
But hey....if you had fun and felt like a hero by sharing....you go right ahead. Most certainly will help keep your "post count" up in the standings, and of course, garner a few strokes from the faithful, will it not ?
And those are the primary goals of doing so, aren't they ?........hehehe.
Glennthen wrote:
Totally pre-spawn and literally the ONLY time I would eat a salmon. If you're eating post spawn salmon you are eating a salmon you found on the bank. You'd be dining with the gulls. ahahah
I have been reading these comments for some time. I wasn't going to get in the fray but what the hell. First I'm amazed at the stupidity of some of the comments even as far away as Florida. That guy probably never saw a live, or dead, Pacific Coast Salmon. As Glennthen says, the only salmon to eat are pre-spawn before the fish turns dark. The fish in the picture was not dark for a catch in freshwater The catch and release issue is one that is a decision for the individual fisherman to make and will be argued between fisherman forever. I personally don't have a problem keeping female salmon in watersheds where there are sustainable numbers of fish. I never keep wild Steelhead females, but those are just my values based on 70 years of fishing for them.
kyle1234 wrote:
I have been reading these comments for some time. I wasn't going to get in the fray but what the hell. First I'm amazed at the stupidity of some of the comments even as far away as Florida. That guy probably never saw a live, or dead, Pacific Coast Salmon. As Glennthen says, the only salmon to eat are pre-spawn before the fish turns dark. The fish in the picture was not dark for a catch in freshwater The catch and release issue is one that is a decision for the individual fisherman to make and will be argued between fisherman forever. I personally don't have a problem keeping female salmon in watersheds where there are sustainable numbers of fish. I never keep wild Steelhead females, but those are just my values based on 70 years of fishing for them.
I have been reading these comments for some time. ... (
show quote)
๐๐.....great apropos post.
don't let dimwits bother you; I've smoked many dark fish and they were great eating
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.