Which is worse?
Mar 18, 2021 10:38:04 #
Would you rather get no bites, or catch no fish, but get a few bites?
--
by thepotatowith3bs
--
by thepotatowith3bs
Mar 18, 2021 11:11:48 #
Mar 18, 2021 11:47:41 #
Mar 18, 2021 12:40:44 #
No bites is worse, as if you get a few bites...at least you were doing something right.
If it was easy...it would be called catching š
If it was easy...it would be called catching š
Mar 18, 2021 16:15:49 #
someone once said, "If your bringing a radio to the beach, you're there for the wrong reason." Same wisdom might apply to fishing. If the only reason you're fishing is to catch fish, you're there for the wrong reason."
I couldn't see the forest, all the trees were in the way.
I couldn't see the forest, all the trees were in the way.
Mar 19, 2021 10:23:53 #
Bites tell me Iām doing something right. The other day I had four hits on my rooster tail but only landed one small rainbow. With that said I call that a good day. Not a great day but a good day
Mar 19, 2021 11:09:57 #
Mar 19, 2021 11:41:56 #
bapabear
Loc: Blaine, Washington
getting bites and not catching fish means the fishing is good. That puts the onus on the fisherman. The challenge is to turn those bites into fish. That is what makes fishing fun and separates the good fisherman from the less experienced. If most experienced fishermen catch a fish every cast, after a bit of time, they will switch gear to see if they can catch them another way.
Mar 19, 2021 15:27:05 #
Mar 19, 2021 15:32:08 #
Littlebassmaster
Loc: Spring City,Tenn. Home lake Wattsbar
I have fished all night with plastic worm and no bites had to fight sleep so a few bites might keep you alert
Mar 19, 2021 18:44:45 #
Be glad to be able to be out fishing. Catching is a huge bonus.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.