Guns and Mail in B****ts: If guns are never ever at fault then mail in b****ts can’t be either. Guns don’t k**l anyone because people do. Mail in b****ts don’t c***t. People do. Is...

Jeremy Loc: America

If guns are never ever at fault then mail in b****ts can’t be either. Guns don’t k**l anyone because people do.

Mail in b****ts don’t c***t. People do.

Is this another double standard? Only a select group claim that Mail in B****ts are the problem. The t***h is Mail in B****ts don’t c***t but people do.

OJdidit Loc: Oak Creek Wisconsin

In the most basic terms, that is true!

Jeremy Loc: America

With so many roads blocked by trees, ice and snow another reason it is great option that has been used since the Civil War.

Bcmech1 Loc: Clinton Wisconsin

Jeremy wrote:

If guns are never ever at fault then mail in b****ts can’t be either. Guns don’t k**l anyone because people do.

Mail in b****ts don’t c***t. People do.

Is this another double standard? Only a select group claim that Mail in B****ts are the problem. The t***h is Mail in B****ts don’t c***t but people do.

Tell the people making more and more restrictive laws trying to ban guns that
They are 'oh my a mass shooting at a school, we must make a new law to punish the legal gun owners because we can't seem to do anything about the criminals'
Sorry, this is a hot button for me.

Jeremy Loc: America

Bcmech1 wrote:

Tell the people making more and more restrictive laws trying to ban guns that
They are 'oh my a mass shooting at a school, we must make a new law to punish the legal gun owners because we can't seem to do anything about the criminals'
Sorry, this is a hot button for me.

Legal gun owners don’t get punished they just play the victim a lot. I have never been punished. The guns don’t k**l … people do… remember?

Just like Mail in B****ts don’t c***t … but people do. This is a simple comparison. Many claim mail in b****ts are the problem. The t***h is c***ters are the problem.

Bcmech1 Loc: Clinton Wisconsin

Jeremy wrote:

Legal gun owners don’t get punished they just play the victim a lot. I have never been punished. The guns don’t k**l … people do… remember?

Just like Mail in B****ts don’t c***t … but people do. This is a simple comparison. Many claim mail in b****ts are the problem. The t***h is c***ters are the problem.

Then why, when the push for a national registry was deemed unconstitutional, they come up with the background check? It's because now they can have their list of gun owners and avoid that pesky constitution thing. That, kind sir, is not playing victim, it is a fact. Sorry it don't fit your "facts"

Paulyups Loc: Spanaway wa

Bcmech1 wrote:

Then why, when the push for a national registry was deemed unconstitutional, they come up with the background check? It's because now they can have their list of gun owners and avoid that pesky constitution thing. That, kind sir, is not playing victim, it is a fact. Sorry it don't fit your "facts"

Right

plumbob Loc: New Windsor Maryland

OJdidit wrote:

In the most basic terms, that is true!

Not quite the analogy I would use for a comparison. " C***ting and K*****g "

There's a bit of a difference between getting shot and k**led by a deranged person with a gun and people c***ting with a mail-in b****t .

Jeremy Loc: America

plumbob wrote:

Not quite the analogy I would use for a comparison. " C***ting and K*****g "

There's a bit of a difference between getting shot and k**led by a deranged person with a gun and people c***ting with a mail-in b****t .

Is it confusing to realize the thing the two have in common is PEOPLE?

You didn’t use them for an analogy. Someone else posted this.

Jeremy Loc: America

Bcmech1 wrote:

Then why, when the push for a national registry was deemed unconstitutional, they come up with the background check? It's because now they can have their list of gun owners and avoid that pesky constitution thing. That, kind sir, is not playing victim, it is a fact. Sorry it don't fit your "facts"

Background Check is great. Some people shouldn’t have them. Actually some can’t v**e either. Both are fine with me.

Bcmech1 Loc: Clinton Wisconsin

Jeremy wrote:

Background Check is great. Some people shouldn’t have them. Actually some can’t v**e either. Both are fine with me.

Then you must not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed" as written in the Constitution. By the Constitution, all gun laws are illegal.

And since you seem to take the Democrat's position

Still above water Loc: San Francisco ca

Jeremy wrote:

If guns are never ever at fault then mail in b****ts can’t be either. Guns don’t k**l anyone because people do.

Mail in b****ts don’t c***t. People do.

Is this another double standard? Only a select group claim that Mail in B****ts are the problem. The t***h is Mail in B****ts don’t c***t but people do.

Then why if u believe that people c***t. Then why even present that opportunity! Yes I agree that it is well founded for our military personnel overseas or stationed out of their state an d US citizens who maybe away. But when I receive five different b****ts in the mail at my home, all in different languages your argument doesn’t hold water! alls it would have taken for me to mail all them in was a simple f**e signature that would never be checked for its authenticity!! Show your damn ID. Yes there be disabled folks or in healthcare facilities who can’t show up to the v****g centers. I understand that argument. But if all these left wing people who are pissed off becauce they can’t give out water to folks in line, may be they can drive them to the polling stations or have a government certified e******n rep verify those who can not get to the polls where they will be held accountable for verifying the b****t. Simple is as simple does!

Placerville Loc: Northern California

Still above water wrote:

Then why if u believe that people c***t. Then why ... (show quote)

👍👍

Still above water Loc: San Francisco ca

So now let’s talk about guns. My governor, Mr. Nuance. Has just directed our Attorney General to initiate legislation to ban the sale of all military grade ammunition in our state. That means that any caliber of ammunition that our military uses, 38, 45, 223, 557, 22, and shotgun shells will become illegal for sale to the general population of the state. Go figure!!! Hitler tried that! How soon we forget!!!

Randyhartford Loc: Lawrence, Kansas

Bcmech1 wrote:

Then you must not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed" as written in the Constitution. By the Constitution, all gun laws are illegal.

You all must remember HE SAID: “simple solution”.
He’s a “simple” man - bless his heart… 🤪