I am gonna go fishing
Feb 14, 2020 14:58:09 #
Feb 14, 2020 15:04:50 #
For the ladies here.
Advice from Tech Support
Dear Tech Support:
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a slow down in the performance of the flower and jewelry applications that had operated flawlessly under the Boyfriend 5.0 system.
In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.9, but installed undesirable programs such as NFL 7.4, NBA 3.2 and NHL 4.1. Conversation 8.0 also no longer runs and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do?
Signed,
Desperate
***************************
Dear Desperate:
First, keep in mind that Boyfriend 5.0 was an entertainment package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Try to enter the command C:/I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME and install Tears 6.2. Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications: Guilt 3.3 and Flowers 7.5.
But remember, overuse can cause Husband 1.0 to default to such background applications as Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0, or Beer 6.1. Please remember that Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will create SnoringLoudly.WAV files. DO NOT install Mother-In-Law 1.0 or reinstall another Boyfriend program. These are not supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.
It could also potentially cause Husband 1.0 to default to the program: Girlfriend 9.2, which runs in the background and has been known to introduce potentially serious v***ses into the Operating System.
In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have a limited memory and can't learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to enhance his system performance. I personally recommend Hot Food 3.0 and Single Malt Scotch 4.5 combined with such applications as B-ob Job 3.6D and that old standby...Lingerie 6.9 (which have both been credited with improved performance of his hardware).
Good Luck,
Tech Support
Advice from Tech Support
Dear Tech Support:
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a slow down in the performance of the flower and jewelry applications that had operated flawlessly under the Boyfriend 5.0 system.
In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.9, but installed undesirable programs such as NFL 7.4, NBA 3.2 and NHL 4.1. Conversation 8.0 also no longer runs and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do?
Signed,
Desperate
***************************
Dear Desperate:
First, keep in mind that Boyfriend 5.0 was an entertainment package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Try to enter the command C:/I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME and install Tears 6.2. Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications: Guilt 3.3 and Flowers 7.5.
But remember, overuse can cause Husband 1.0 to default to such background applications as Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0, or Beer 6.1. Please remember that Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will create SnoringLoudly.WAV files. DO NOT install Mother-In-Law 1.0 or reinstall another Boyfriend program. These are not supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.
It could also potentially cause Husband 1.0 to default to the program: Girlfriend 9.2, which runs in the background and has been known to introduce potentially serious v***ses into the Operating System.
In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have a limited memory and can't learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to enhance his system performance. I personally recommend Hot Food 3.0 and Single Malt Scotch 4.5 combined with such applications as B-ob Job 3.6D and that old standby...Lingerie 6.9 (which have both been credited with improved performance of his hardware).
Good Luck,
Tech Support
Feb 15, 2020 07:09:18 #
Feb 15, 2020 11:57:05 #
Wulffy, you're freakin' priceless !
Tell it like it is, brother ! If anyone
doesn't believe him, see Rodney
Carrington's performance of his tune - "Show Them to Me" !
Tell it like it is, brother ! If anyone
doesn't believe him, see Rodney
Carrington's performance of his tune - "Show Them to Me" !
Feb 15, 2020 12:37:55 #
Big A wrote:
Wulffy, you're freakin' priceless !
Tell it like it is, brother ! If anyone
doesn't believe him, see Rodney
Carrington's performance of his tune - "Show Them to Me" !
Tell it like it is, brother ! If anyone
doesn't believe him, see Rodney
Carrington's performance of his tune - "Show Them to Me" !
Live is funny.
Feb 15, 2020 13:12:30 #
Feb 15, 2020 13:24:22 #
CamT wrote:
Titties and beer!! are what I hold dear and fishing
Often depends a different order.
That is attic material.
Feb 15, 2020 13:33:03 #
Feb 15, 2020 13:41:03 #
CamT wrote:
Made me look!! I thought we were in attic whew!! panic attack lol
Gottcha huh??
LOL
Feb 15, 2020 14:14:12 #
Well, it ain't religious and it ain't political, although it may be somewhat less pure than the driven snow ! Come to think of
it, it just might be somewhat religious, as I am a devout fan
of boobs, myself !
it, it just might be somewhat religious, as I am a devout fan
of boobs, myself !
Feb 15, 2020 14:17:26 #
Big A wrote:
Well, it ain't religious and it ain't political, although it may be somewhat less pure than the driven snow ! Come to think of
it, it just might be somewhat religious, as I am a devout fan
of boobs, myself !
it, it just might be somewhat religious, as I am a devout fan
of boobs, myself !
I think it might depend on the definition.
Feb 15, 2020 15:53:12 #
Sorry ! None of the above ! For
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
Feb 15, 2020 15:55:32 #
Big A wrote:
Sorry ! None of the above ! For
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
LOL
Feb 15, 2020 15:56:09 #
Big A wrote:
Sorry ! None of the above ! For
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
clarification (if REALLY needed), see Graywulff's earlier posting !
I don't think ANYONE
questioned that; it's pretty much
self-explanatory !
Just trying to include some others.
Feb 15, 2020 20:11:59 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.