DC Loc: Washington state

just heard on the news the death rate from those who had complications of the c***d v*****e is really low .0017% which got me thinking what is the death rate in the US from c***d so I binged the current death count from c***d and the population of the us and found 601,407 have died out of 333,412,826 so I did a little math 601,407/333,412,826 and ended up with .0018 have died from c***d. So does this mean your risk of dyeing from c***d is only .0001 more than dyeing from the v*****e? I know I am not a mathematician and thought one of you attic dwellers might be better at math than I am and could clarify if this is correct. I can't believe it is but don't know where my math is wrong.

Catfish hunter Loc: Riggins idaho (Paradise)

You are pretty close and the v*****e count has just started. It’s not gonna be pretty any way you do the math.

CamT Loc: La Porte, Texas

🤯

DC Loc: Washington state

[quote=DC]just heard on the news the death rate from those who had complications of the c***d v*****e is really low .0017%

OK I did a little checking on the news report. It turns they reported it wrong. instead of .0017 it should have been.000017 they missed a few zero's in the report but actually the number of fully v******ted people I was able to find was 125,397,606 and 3722 deaths so 3722/125397606 would be .000029 so you are about 60 times more likely to die from c***d than from the c***d v*****e. that sounds more like it. I guess it just goes to show you, you can't trust what you hear on the news or at least "trust but verify"

Catfish hunter Loc: Riggins idaho (Paradise)

[quote=DC][quote=DC]just heard on the news the death rate from those who had complications of the c***d v*****e is really low .0017%

OK I did a little checking on the news report. It turns they reported it wrong. instead of .0017 it should have been.000017 they missed a few zero's in the report but actually the number of fully v******ted people I was able to find was 125,397,606 and 3722 deaths so 3722/125397606 would be .000029 so you are about 60 times more likely to die from c***d than from the c***d v*****e. that sounds more like it. I guess it just goes to show you, you can't trust what you hear on the news or at least "trust but verify"[/quote

The news is something good to avoid now days for sure. It’ll be something different in 24 hours. Then we’ll have to decide what “related” means again now with the v*****e just like the murky water c***d “related” deaths. Related how?🤷‍♂️

dbed Loc: POMME DE TERRE LAKE MISSOURI

The media only gives political corrupt/correct news based on F***i, a corrupt Dr

plumbob Loc: New Windsor Maryland

News? Is there such a thing or is it what someone ( nameless ) wants to control us with?

Catfish hunter Loc: Riggins idaho (Paradise)

The i***t?

plumbob Loc: New Windsor Maryland

I would say yes, but there is a list with that title.

Catfish hunter Loc: Riggins idaho (Paradise)

That’s very true. A LONG list.

FixorFish Loc: SW Oregon

The morbidity factor FROM the v*****e is based on # of DOSES ADMINISTERED, not on the entire population's #.
It's always best if you get your "news" from a myriad of DIVERSE sources. Listening/watching to but one or two only, will most likely give you a jaded or slanted view, and suspect "factoids".
Don't ever place limitations of your knowledge by relying on any ONE source, it surely will fail you at some point in time.

Infallibility does not exist.

DC Loc: Washington state

you are correct I was comparing the death rate of those who got the v*****e against the entire population so if you subtracted the number of people who got the v*****e from the whole population the death rate among only those who did not get the v*****e would be a little higher although since they were part of the general population before getting the v*****e if you make the comparison post January 2021 then the general death rate of the general population against those who have gotten the v*****e would be more accurate. But I think the results would be about the same and that you would find you are still approximately 60 times more likely to die of c***d if you hadn't gotten the shot vs if you got the shot, but even that most likely is not accurate since the death rate from c***d was already coming down which would have brought the 60 times number significantly down as well. I personally at my age would still get the shot now any way since I think the risk vs benefit still tilts towards the benefit side.

as to your other point the more different sources you can get information from the better, that is why this cancel culture and big media censorship is so dangerous often the accepted "t***h" turns out not to be the t***h at all and those who were branded as t***h deniers end up being the t***h defenders. T***h is not determined by majority opinion. You are correct infallibility does not exist among mankind but I believe God is t***h and He alone in infallible but as God has said in the Bible "your ways are not my ways and your thoughts not my thoughts"

Mauwehu Loc: Norwalk Ct

Gotta be careful in the attic....
You might fall through the ceiling!
Hard to know the t***h in a season of liars. Which I guess explains why more people are still wearing their masks even when the president and the governor said it’s over in Ct.
Nothing makes sense. I see people alone in their car wearing a mask. You have to wear a mask into the diner only to remove it to eat. I could go on and on.

FixorFish Loc: SW Oregon

DC....👍

Catfish hunter Loc: Riggins idaho (Paradise)

The simple fact that people are dying from a v*****e that’s designed to “save the world” is rather alarming wouldn’t you say? 4000 fewer people would have died so far from “c***d related” issues had it not been for the v*****e. They haven’t proven the v*****e has saved anyone. They just SAY it has. I know plenty of people who have been “diagnosed” with c***d AFTER getting the v*****e. And it’s true now that if you are not v******ted and you end up with a cold or flu it’s going to be “c***d” because you chose not to be v******ted. There’s no plan for this to come to an end that I’ve heard of.